Staying Ahead When Risk Keeps Changing: What Multinational Companies Are Doing Differently

By Kevin M. Strong and Sean Nelson | April, 2026

Providing Reliability in an Uncertain World

The global risk environment facing multinational businesses has rarely been more complex or more dynamic. Over the past several years, companies have had to navigate a convergence of structural shifts: geopolitical fragmentation, persistent inflationary pressures, evolving liability regimes, and increasingly volatile climate patterns. While these forces are not entirely new, their simultaneity and scale are reshaping how organizations think about risk, resilience, and the role of insurance.

A New Phase of Global Volatility

In the years immediately following the COVID-19 pandemic, supply chain disruption and inflation dominated boardroom discussions. Today, those concerns have not disappeared - they have evolved into a broader, more structural uncertainty driven by geopolitics, legal trends, and environmental change.

Geopolitics and the Rewiring of Global Trade

Multinational companies are operating in a world where political alignment increasingly influences economic outcomes. Trade relationships, once governed primarily by efficiency and cost, are now shaped by national security considerations, regulatory divergence, and shifting alliances.

Evolving geopolitical dynamics are prompting companies to rethink and reconfigure their global supply chains. Many companies are pursuing “China-plus-one” or regionalization strategies, shifting manufacturing and service operations to countries such as Vietnam, India, Malaysia, and the Philippines. At the same time, nearshoring to North America has gained traction as firms seek greater control and resilience.

Yet these shifts introduce new layers of complexity. Emerging markets often present regulatory variability, infrastructure gaps, and political risk. In parallel, evolving trade policy, including tariffs, sanctions, and export controls, remains fluid and, at times, unpredictable. Even where specific policies are rolled back or challenged, the broader trajectory toward economic fragmentation appears durable.

Beyond trade, geopolitical instability continues to disrupt regional operating environments. The war in Ukraine has fundamentally altered European security assumptions, while political volatility across parts of Latin America and other regions introduces additional uncertainty for companies with cross-border exposure. For multinational firms, risk is no longer confined to isolated geographies - it is systemic and interconnected.

Rising Liability and Social Inflation in the United States

While global risks are expanding, the United States remains one of the most challenging liability environments in the world. Social inflation, the trend of increasing claims severity driven by litigation, jury behavior, and broader societal factors, continues to pressure insurers and insureds alike.

Courts are seeing more expansive interpretations of liability, alongside the emergence of new legal theories. Claims that would have been considered novel a decade ago are now gaining traction, including litigation tied to technology usage, consumer behavior, and evolving product liability standards.

At the same time, so-called “nuclear verdicts,” exceptionally large jury awards, are becoming more frequent. These outcomes not only increase the cost of individual claims but also reset expectations for future settlements. Medical cost inflation further compounds the issue, raising the baseline for damages and contributing to sustained upward pressure on loss severity.

Climate Volatility and Physical Risk

Climate-related risk is no longer a long-term consideration; it is an immediate operational reality. The frequency and severity of natural catastrophes have increased, with events such as wildfires, convective storms, and flooding causing significant disruption across multiple regions.

What is changing is not only the intensity of these events, but their predictability. Historical loss patterns are becoming less reliable indicators of future risk, complicating underwriting, pricing, and risk management strategies.

For multinational organizations, the implications extend beyond physical damage. Climate events disrupt supply chains, impact workforce availability, and create cascading effects across interconnected operations. A single event in one region can trigger downstream consequences globally.

Implications for Multinational Risk Management

Taken together, these forces are driving a fundamental shift in how companies approach risk:

  • Greater emphasis on resilience over efficiency, particularly in supply chain design
  • Increased demand for consistency across jurisdictions, as operations span diverse regulatory environments
  • Heightened focus on data and analytics, to better understand and price emerging risks
  • Stronger alignment between insurance and operational strategy, particularly for large, complex organizations

In this context, insurance is no longer viewed solely as a financial backstop. It is increasingly expected to function as a strategic partner in navigating uncertainty.

The Evolving Role of Global Insurance Platforms

As multinational risk becomes more interconnected, traditional approaches, often built on fragmented, country-by-country coverage, are being reevaluated. Organizations are seeking greater integration, both in how coverage is structured and how services are delivered.

This has contributed to growing interest in global insurance platforms that can provide coordinated coverage, consistent underwriting philosophy, and integrated claims and risk engineering capabilities across jurisdictions.

N2G Worldwide is one example of a platform designed with this model in mind. Formed during a period of constrained market capacity, the company has focused on multinational risks that require coordination across both domestic and international exposures.

Its approach centers on several key elements:
  • Integrated global coverage: A unified program structure designed to reduce fragmentation and provide consistency across jurisdictions
  • Coordinated claims infrastructure: Leveraging global and domestic claims networks to deliver local expertise with centralized oversight
  • Data-driven underwriting: Streamlining processes to improve speed, transparency, and decision-making
  • Embedded risk engineering: Providing on-the-ground insights and guidance to help clients reduce loss frequency and severity

While these capabilities are not unique to any single provider, they reflect a broader industry shift toward more integrated, service-oriented models.

Looking Ahead

Uncertainty is not a temporary condition; it is becoming a defining feature of the global operating environment. Geopolitical realignment, legal system evolution, and climate volatility are likely to remain persistent forces shaping risk for years to come.

For multinational businesses, the challenge is not simply to react to these changes, but to build systems, operational, financial, and strategic, that can adapt to them.

In that context, the role of insurance continues to evolve. Beyond transferring risk, it increasingly serves as a mechanism for enabling stability, supporting growth, and providing confidence in an unpredictable world.

Follow us on LinkedIn



About the Authors:

Kevin M. Strong, Chief Executive Officer, N2G

Kevin is an industry veteran with more than 20 years of multi-line experience and more than 17 serving multinational clients both in the United States and abroad.Prior to joining N2G, Kevin was Head of Multinational at The Hartford overseeing all aspects of The Hartford’s multinational outbound and inbound portfolios, The Hartford’s Global Insurer Network and its Canadian branch operations. Previously, Kevin served as Worldwide Director of Global Programs for XL Catlin in addition to holding leadership positions at Marsh USA and Aon Plc in New York. Kevin began his insurance career in 2002 with State Farm Insurance and holds a B.S.B. In Risk Management and Finance from the University of Minnesota’s Carlson School of Management.


Sean Nelson, Head of Compliance, N2G

Sean has interpreted regulations and statutes since he graduated law school in 2011. For the first eight years, he interpreted federal and state employment law at the Iowa Civil Rights Commission to determine agency action in those lawsuits. He then took these general legal concepts and applied them to an internal compliance role at a land grant university, Iowa State. For the last four years, he served as an administrative law judge applying the law to dozens of hearings per week.